Obama The Fraud

Greatest fraud in U.S. HIstory 
-the short version-
By Lawrence Sellin

A political deal will be struck to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

A growing number of Americans are now learning that Barack Obama, according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President. The law requires a candidate for the Presidency to be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth.

Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and a British subject at the time of his birth, which made him forever ineligible for the Presidency.

Practically speaking, that issue is not a problem for Obama because the Republican Party also wants to violate the Constitution. Many Republicans are aggressively advocating Florida Senator Marco Rubio as Mitt Romney’s Vice Presidential candidate. Rubio is ineligible because, even though he was born in the United States, his parents were Cuban citizens at the time of his birth.

Since 1975, both Democrat and Republican politicians have been trying unsuccessfully to amend Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution. The election of Obama has allowed them to do so, not legally, but by fait accompli.

According to the wishes of Democrat and Republican politicians, Anwar al-Awlaki, killed by a drone strike on September 30, 2011, was eligible to be President because he was born in New Mexico of Yemeni parents. Al-Awlaki was the “spiritual leader” of al-Qaida in the Arabian peninsula, whose sermons at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia were attended by two hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attacks, Nawaf al-Hamzi and Hani Hanjour. Likewise, accused Fort Hood shooter and alleged al-Awlaki disciple, Nidal Malik Hasan, is eligible to be President because he was born in Virginia of Palestinian parents.

There are also persistent questions about the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate, Selective Service registration and his use of a Social Security number not issued to him, all serious crimes with the potential for lengthy prison sentences.

The law, however, is not a problem for Obama because any serious investigation would implicate far too many Democrat and Republican politicians. That is why the political establishment and the media are suppressing every effort to uncover the truth about Obama’s personal history because it would expose their own corruption and hypocrisy.

The greatest danger to Obama is the potential collapse of the Democrat Party from the failed policies engineered by his Administration and the Party’s progressive wing.

The Clinton faction and other Democrats outside of Obama’s circle of supporters now fear he may be leading the Party, not only to certain electoral defeat, but to political oblivion. They are actively working behind the scenes, likely with the collusion of Republicans, to ensure Obama’s defeat or, perhaps, even quietly to force him out of the 2012 Presidential contest. They all have a vested interest in maintaining the balance of power of the political status quo, which an Obama victory would permanently alter.

An Obama win would, for example, forever eliminate Clinton Democrats as a political factor and nullify all the Republican economic arguments, which represent the core of the Romney campaign.

In general, however, politicians’ concern for the well-being of country exists only in the context of the power they wield and the health of their financial portfolios and that is the essence of the Obama threat that they perceive.

Much can happen between now and November to determine whether or not the non-Obama Democrat and Republican coalition will succeed. Will Attorney General Eric Holder be forced to resign paving the way for other investigations? Will there be selective leaks to embarrass Obama? Will the financiers and liberal media turn against him? Will Obama be privately blackmailed or promised a pardon?

The fate of Obama has already been determined, not by voters, but by powerbrokers using tactics that will unfold over the coming months.

There is one thing, however, that is certain. Regardless of who wins in November, Obama’s alleged crimes will never be fully investigated and his personal history will never be exposed by either Democrat or Republican politicians. Their involvement in a conspiracy of silence is unmistakable and their protection of Obama stems solely from political self-interest.

Barack Obama has been issued a “get out of jail free” card by a corrupt political establishment and a dishonest media.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Afghanistan and the Culture of Military Leadership”. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

Democrat election headquarters 2012

I looked in the front door of a Democrat 2012 election headquarters recently. The official who greeted me did not ask if I were a Democrat or not. As soon as I poked my nose in the door, this nicely dressed late 50ish she-person started her “party line” electioneering about [1] the far right radical tea party, [2] rampant racism by the tea party, and [3] the GOP Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, who promised to stop Obama in his tracks as soon as he was elected President.

She made no positive comments whatsoever about Obama. Her entire theme was all about the radical tea party and racism. I let her carry on and then finally told her that I was not a Democrat. 

It was instructive listing to her … just like listening to the radical left’s so called “news” reports and opinions.

I would appear that our 2012 Democrats believe that this kind of rhetoric is going to convince our middle of the road voters that Obama needs four more years by trashing Republicans. Of course, there is not much positive news coming from Obama and the Left to brag about – 

• the health care fiasco that few want
• crony energy loans
• punitive energy regulations and taxes

• secretive back room deals and payoffs
• presidential legislation that bypasses Congress
• unaccountable czars

• jobs lost
• personal savings lost
• high unemployment

• fewer people in the labor force
• inflation
• devalued dollar, and 

• more taxes. 

Negativity is all the Democrats have.

For an entertaining and informative experience, drop in on your local Democrat field. Listen and learn. ... and be sure to treat everyone respectfully and clean up after yourself, as always. =TheRightJack 6/27/12

Book: Secret Service rates the Presidents

From the Secret Service personnel assigned to guard U.S. Presidents, First Ladies and Vice Presidents.

Very interesting snippets about our presidents from ... 


"Impressions & Observations" by Ronald Kessler

JOHN & JACQUELINE KENNEDY john-f-kennedy-495

* A philanderer of the highest order. *

* She ordered the kitchen help to save all the left-over wine during State dinner, mixed with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.*

LYNDON & LADYBIRD JOHNSON capt_8a4e199fa59655cfd8d568449ad9dfd4

* Another philanderer of the highest order. In addition, LBJ was as crude as the day is long. Both JFK and LBJ kept a lot of women in the White House for extramarital affairs, and both had set up "early warning systems" to alert them if/when their wives were nearby. Both Kennedy & Johnson were promiscuous and oversexed men. *

* She was either naive or just pretended to "not know" about her husband's many liaisons. *

RICHARD & PAT NIXON abc

* A "moral" man but very odd, weird, paranoid, etc. He had horrible relationship with his family, and in a way, was almost a recluse.*

* She was quiet most of the time.*

SPIRO AGNEW agnew

* Nice, decent man, everyone in the Secret Service was surprised about his downfall. *

GERALD & BETTY FORD abc

* A true gentlemen who treated the Secret Service with respect and dignity. He had a great sense of humor. *

* She drank a lot!*

JIMMY & ROSALYN CARTER abc d

* A complete phony who would portray one picture of himself to public and very different in private, e.g., would be shown carrying his own luggage, but the suit cases were always empty; he kept empty ones just for photo op's. Wanted the people to see him as pious and a non-drinker, but he and his family drank alcohol a lot. He had disdain for the Secret Service, and was very irresponsible with the "football" nuclear codes. He didn't think it was a big deal and would keep military aides at a great distance. Often did not acknowledge the presence of Secret Service personnel assigned to serve him.*

* She mostly did her own thing.*

RONALD & NANCY REAGAN abc

* The real deal --- moral, honest, respectful, and dignified. They treated Secret Service and everyone else with respect and honor. Thanked everyone all the time. He took the time to know everyone on a personal level. 


* One "favorite" story which has circulated among the Secret Service personnel was an incident early in his Presidency, when he came out of his room with a pistol tucked on his hip. The agent in charge asked: "Why the pistol, Mr. President" He replied, "In case you boys can't get the job done, I can help." It was common for him to carry a pistol. When he met with Gorbachev, he had a pistol in his briefcase. Upon learning that Gary Hart was caught with Donna Rice, Reagan said, "Boys will be boys, but boys will not be Presidents." [He obviously either did not know or forgot JFK's and LBJ's sexcapades!]*

* She was very nice but very protective of the President; and the Secret Service was often caught in the middle. She tried hard to control what the President ate, and he would say to the agent "Come on, you gotta help me out." The Reagans drank wine during State dinners and special occasions only; otherwise, they shunned alcohol; the Secret Service could count on one hand the times they were served wine during their "family dinner". For all the fake bluster of the Carters, the Reagans were the ones who lived life as genuinely moral people.*

GEORGE H. & BARBARA BUSH abc 2

* Extremely kind and considerate Always respectful. Took great care in making sure the agents' comforts were taken care of. They even brought them meals, etc. One time Barbara Bush brought warm clothes to agents standing outside at Kennebunkport; one agent was given a warm hat, and when he tried to nicely say "no thanks" even though he was obviously freezing, President Bush said "Son, don't argue with the First Lady, put the hat on." He was the most prompt of the Presidents. He ran the White House like a well-oiled machine.*

* She ruled the house and spoke her mind.*

BILL & HILLARY CLINTON abc 3

* Presidency was one giant party. Not trustworthy --- he was nice because he wanted everyone to like him, but to him life is just one big game and party. Everyone knows of his sexuality.*

* She is another phony. Her personality would change the instant cameras were near. She hated with open disdain the military and Secret Service. She was another one who felt people are there to serve her. She was always trying to keep tabs on Bill Clinton.*

ALBERT GORE abcd1

* An egotistical ass, who was once overheard by his Secret Service detail lecturing his only son that he needed to do better in school or he "would end up like these guys" --- pointing to the agents.*

GEORGE W. & LAURA BUSH abcde

* The Secret Service loved him and Laura Bush. He was also the most physically "in shape" who had a very strict workout regimen. The Bushes made sure their entire administrative and household staff understood to respect and be considerate of the Secret Service.

* She was one of the nicest First Ladies, if not the nicest; she never had any harsh word to say about anyone.*

* KARL ROVE was the one who was the most caring of the Secret Service in the administration.*

BARACK & MICHELLE OBAMA abc

* "Clinton all over again" - hates the military and looks down on the Secret Service. He is egotistical and cunning; looks you in the eye and appears to agree with you, but turns around and does the opposite---untrustworthy. He has temper tantrums.* aobama

* She is a complete bitch, abc 1 who hates anybody who is not black; hates the military; and looks at the Secret Service as servants.*

Notes: Undated email.

A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders.

Obama 2012, the year that was

Red Flags Raised:

How will Obama and the Democrats create diversions and obstacles to smother the US economy and nail US voters?

Bumper Sticker: 

I support Cap and Trade. 

Cap our spending and Trade Obama.

Immigrant Diversion. Obama bypasses Congress and grants immunity to certain illegal aliens. Democrats had control of Congress for the last two years of Bush 43 and the first two years of Obama 44. Congress accomplished nothing. Now Democrats and the Big Dem Media blame Republicans that nothing is happening. 6/24/12

Diversion failed. Democrat “War on Women” diversion against GOP apparently backfired as GOP picks up more support from moms and other women.

Obama holding off on going ahead with the Canadian pipeline until after the election so that his "eco-greenies" will give him all of their support. Then it is full steam ahead on the pipeline after he is re-elected. Is there anything on the Left that is not about politics. 4/17/12

Democrat from Maine Legislature says former VP Dick Cheney should be executed. [themainewire.com] 4/13/12 
 + +
Certainly Chairman Obama has had enough time to jump all over this fellow Democrat for his harsh partisan rhetoric. Heard anything yet? Obama waded into the Harvard [beer summit] and Sanford situations with knee-jerk speed. Hmmm! Looks like more predictable partisan politics at the White House.
 +  +
Obama has yet to denounce Rep Maxine Waters [D-CA] for her childish name calling directed at Mitt Romney.

Double-Talk. Obama White House pays women 18% less than men. [mediaite.com] 4/11/12
 + + 
And Democrats accuse Republicans of conducting a war on women. Note that Democrats consider white married women and Republican African American women fair game. College women and single mothers are safe from Democrat attacks.

Signs that a drowning man is grasping for straws ... Obama Warns Ryan's GOP Budget Would Make Weather Prediction Less Accurate. 4/4/12 

 + +

Obama on the Paul Ryan budget: "We wouldn't have the capacity to enforce the laws that protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, or the food that we eat. Cuts to the FAA would likely result in more flight cancellations, delays and the complete elimination of air traffic control services in parts of the country. Over time, our weather forecasts would become less accurate because we wouldn't be able to afford to launch new satellites and that means governors and mayors would have to wait longer to order evacuations in the event of a hurricane. That's just a partial sampling of the consequences of this budget." - - - Obama [realclearpolitics.com] 4/3/12 

 + +

... while squashing businesses, creating inflation and bankrupting the nation while putting millions of work people out of work is actually very good for the economy?

Obama lights into Supreme Court. [godfatherpolitics.com] 4/2/12 Imperial Obama Reign taking charge of US. So much for separation of powers and the three branches of US government. He has already taken charge of Congress.

Holder and DOJ challenging state laws related to voter identification. Obama does not want to limit voting to legal voters. 4/1/12

TRUST: Can we trust Obama to rule the USA with a fair hand by adhering to the US Constitution, if he gains a 2^nd term in office by whatever means. 3/29/12

 + +

President Obama to Russian President Dimitri Medvedev concerning missile defense: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility. Hurry. See the 32 second ABC video record, before it is scrubbed. [news.yahoo.com] 3/26/12

 + +

One might translate this as: After my election, I can do what ever I want to do. Want more of our secrets? No problemo tovarisch. But first, let me bow to your superior Russian intellect, compassion, friendship and peaceful intentions.

 + +

More on More Flexibility news [www.wnd.com]

 + +

Reagan: Trust but verify. There is no way to verify what Obama would do if he were to be elected by hook or crook to a second term in office.

Obama campaign selling Trayvon Martin hoodies. Heard on the radio 3/27/12. How crass.


In light of this Trayvon Martin shooting, Obama and Holder have nothing to say about black on black crime. Both Obama and Zimmerman, the shooter, are 1/2 white but Zimmerman is 1/2 black while Obama only 5% black.


Obama blames Congress for big bad loans to speculative solar companies. 3/25/12

Obama recites the islamic call to prayer. With translation. See video. [patriotactionnetwork.com] 2/27/07

Who is Jim Yong Kim? Dartmouth Medical Professor nominated by Obama to be next president of World Bank from USA. [wsj.com/economics] 3/23/12

Obama solution to reduce gasoline consumption:
• Buy a Chevie Volt. Oh, GM shut down production.
• Algae. Why not kudzu?
• Pump up your tires
• Has not yet mentioned walking to work
• Stop flying
• Buy a mule
Remember, we cannot drill our way out of these high gas prices ... But Bush 43 did it by turning off US restrictions on off shore drilling.


Executive Order by Obama. Takes over agriculture, all forms of energy, health resources, transportation, water and commerce with National Defense Resources Preparedness order [examiner.com] 3/16/12 He decides. Had enough yet?

What privacy? The Obama National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) wants to require businesses to surrender lists of employees’ phone numbers and personal email addresses to union organizers. Giving away employees’ personal contact information violates basic privacy rights and will inevitably lead to workers being targeted for harassment at the hands of union bosses. [townhall.com] 3/18/12


3/16/12 Obama 15 question vote quiz [townhall.com]


3/14/12 Secy of Defense Panetta allows US military to be disarmed in high level meetings in Afghanistan. [telegraph.co.uk] DoD chief Panetta bows to will of Afghans ... how to make our soldiers targets in a theater of war.

3/8/12 Two political faces of Obama. Obama lobbies against Canadian pipeline with member of Congress while telling the people through His Big Dem Press that important matters like this should not be political.

3/8/12 Panetta and Obama Administration give authority over USA international activities and Congress to UN making US Constitution toothless. [quitenormal.com] 3/8/12

Note: 90% or more of UN members are anti-American. Why? They are run be dictators where freedom and personal liberty are concepts that take away their autocratic power to eliminate dissent.

2/29/12 Letter from Barry to Joe [personalliberty.com]

2/29/12 Spreading the Wealth. Taking from the wealthy and giving to the wealthy [e.g., solar energy companies, GM union] who return the favor by giving massive campaign donations to Obama. Meanwhile, among the little people, there are 2 million fewer jobs now than when Obama became Ruler of the USA.

2/24/12 Obama apologizes to Afghans for our accidental burning of Korans. One report, and only one, stated that there were terrorism notes in the margins of their holy books. I wonder how many Korans have been destroyed by muslim terrorist suicide bombings.

2/13/12 Obama wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal down to levels that will not allow us to defend ourselves properly or keep our enemies from even thinking about launching attacks against the USA.

Replay! How about mortgages for people who cannot afford to pay for their new homes. Was this not the Great Big Dem Gov idea that got us into this economic mess in the first place? Yes. So, let's do it again? Really?

2/8/12 Free cell phones for everyone who cannot pay for them. Who does pay for them? Big Dem Gov? NOT! US Taxpayers, of course.

2/7/12 Obama eliminates combat pay for soldiers unless they are being shot at.

2/4/12 Unemployment report for January 2012. Unemployment falls as fewer and fewer people hold jobs and the percentage of the eligible workforce on government assistance continues to rise.

2/3/12 Obama rules that even catholic church related hospitals provide birth control service or lose Big Dem Gov money. 25% of US hospitals are catholic-based.

Prior to this, ObamaCare requires that abortion services must be provided. Both requirements are contrary to catholic church dogma. It appears that a majority of catholics do not care one way or the other.

Meanwhile, muslim dogma in USA gets one pass after another. Examples: There are instances where sharia law has replaced US law in court. The supposed Big Dem Gov conflict between government and religion [i.e., Christmas] has been waived in the case of government and muslim religious practices in the USA.

1/20/12. How does Obama legally and ethically accumulate $7 million in net worth in less than 25 years.

1/18/12. Obama vetoes Canadian oil pipeline citing GOP arbitrary timeline. Unions angry. Obama money backers angry. As with oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, Obama supports it but places permit obstacles in the path of drilling and energy self-sufficiency. 


Pipeline veto is Politics over common sense and the US jobs picture.
• Why? Obama wants to postpone action on this until after the election. 
• Why? EnviroCrats may not vote for Obama if he allows it to pass before the 2012 election.

@CatoInstitute on twitter. Cato Institute Obama Proposes New Department of Corporate Welfare: bit.ly/yf5psl 1/16/12 Unlike Bain Capital, no serious cost savings anticipated. Just Bigger Gov.

@michellemalkin on Twitter Michelle Malkin 

RT @verumserum: Green Energy Sinkhole: Obama's $6.5 Billion Junk Bond Empire - is.gd/AJgevI 1/13/12

1/10/12. Just uncovered. 2009 Alice in Wonderland Halloween Party at White House that the White House media tried to keep secret - another cover up. What transparency? Then denied that they tried to keep it secret. See photos. Cost to US Taxpayers not revealed. There would have been a huge media stink had any Republican thrown a party of self-indulgence like this. [theblaze.com] 1/10/12

1/6/12. Obama Busted. $730M fed loan to Russian-owned steel firm withdrawn after GOP challenge [michellemalkin.com] 1/6/12 Click Here to read the interesting story of more “quiet” Big Dem Gov spending that was stopped under the watchful eyes of our own GOP do-nothing Congressional reps. US Taxpayer money to Brazil, China, Russia, UN and on and on. It never stops. AND WE ARE BROKE.

Obama names three more unconstitutional NLRB appointments of union sympathizers during the non-existent Congressional recess. BTW: Democrats block Bush appointments to NLRB.

Writer in Comment section of this article notes that Democrats in Congress blocked Bush appointments to NLRB for two years. That is why there were vacancies. So, Democrats get their way by naming three more ObamaCrats as he blames Congress.

1/4/11. Appoints John Cordray in recess appointment to head Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. What obstacles will he bring forth to cripple business. Infers that Wall Street needs attention, the largest contributor to Obama campaign.

1/3/12. US gives 51% of UN global warming panel. Not shown in budget documents examined by GAO. $20 B-b-billion invested in these climate hoaxes over the pat 13 years. [cnsnews.com]1/3/12 What else is Big Transparent Dem Gov hiding from us regarding this hoax and other matters?

12/30/11. $14 million. Cost of Obama vacations in 2010. Heard on Fox radio. Not getting much attention in the Big Time Dem media.

Remember all of the millions of US Taxpayer dollars that Obama gave to solar energy companies that went bankrupt.

Remember that Obama and Family have spent millions on lavish vacations and White House parties [e.g., Halloween] while million of Americans are out of work and million more have stopped looking for work.

Remember that Obama and his Democrats have failed to stand behind or beside Israel, our only true friend in the Middle East.

Remember that Obama has yet to prove without doubts that he is a US citizen.

Remember when Obama Secretary of State Clinton adopted the UN's No Guns for Citizens agenda.

Remember when Obama DOJ AG Holder elected to not prosecute the New Black Panthers for their aggressively intimidating polling tactics. August 2011

Remember when Obama DOJ AG Holder threatened and sued selected states so that they will be forced to stop enforcing existing immigration laws.

Remember when Obama decreed that US solders in the middle east may not fire until they are fired upon.

Remember when Obama gave millions to China to study why their prostitutes drink.

Remember when Obama gave billions to Brazil for off shore drilling ... and it does not benefit the USA in any way ... and ... he continues to stifle off shore drilling that would benefits the USA.

Remember when Obama bowed before other heads of state.

Remember when Obama was snubbed in Russia, like a non-person.

Remember when Obama referred to the "corpes men"

Remember when Obama appointed all of those radical leftist czars, mot of whom had no business experience.

Remember when Obama referred to the 57 states, known properly as the 57 muslim states.

Remember when Obama bailed out GM, and the total amount has yet to be repaid.

Violations of the Constitution by Obama

Obama Hot Line set up to report racial profiling in Arizona while Big Dem Gov refuses to protect the border and US citizens against border violations. 6/25/12



Rumor: It has been widely alleged that terrorists are slipping into the USA through Mexico. Big Dem Gov elects not to enforce border laws, a direct violation of the US Constitution.

The top 10 violations of the Constitution by Obama and the 111th Congress
By Paul Skousen - The Daily Caller
6:14 PM 12/27/2010

At the close of the 111th Congress, America is deeply in the bog of Thomas Jefferson’s prophetic warning: “The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.” Unfortunately, the broken chains of the Constitution have failed to contain the federal government.

By way of review, let’s take a stroll through the junkyard of constitutional violations that have been painted fresh by President Obama and the 111th Congress. Here’s my top-ten list, highly abbreviated for length.

#10. — 9/11 Responders Relief Fund: We love and honor those who put themselves in harm’s way for our security. However, giving the 9/11 first responders money after the fact violates the Constitution. Article 1.8 gives Congress the right to expend funds for all the purposes itemized, provided it is done for the general welfare, NOT for individuals or preferred groups. The states may reward heroes if they so choose.

#9. — Checks and Balances Failure: The Chairmanship of the UN Security Council: Where was Congress when President Obama became the chairman of the powerful UN Security Council in 2009? The normal monthly rotation for that chair goes to the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. because Article 1.9 of the Constitution forbids the president (and all other office-holders) from accepting any present, foreign office or title from a foreign country or a foreign potentate unless it is specifically authorized by Congress. The Founders wanted to prevent deal-making, corruption, and foreign influence from affecting America’s internal affairs.

#8. — Net Neutrality: The government is trying to stop Internet providers from blocking or slowing some web traffic and prevent providers from showing favoritism. The FCC thinks it should be able to regulate the Internet like it regulates utility companies. This violates the property rights of Internet providers and interferes in the market’s free choice of which services receive funding. Article 1.8 makes it clear that the FCC is not constitutionally authorized to pass laws, especially those disguised as regulations.

#7. – Czars: The moniker for appointees who report to no one but the president has taken on a new and eerie resemblance to the dusty Russian tsars of old. Article 2.2 grants the president leeway to appoint managers, but those managers may not have any regulatory, legislative or law-making powers — such powers are reserved to the legislative branch. Today’s “czars” have the power of cabinet members without having to go through a vetting process or the confirmation process prescribed for cabinet members. Czars are unelected and untouchable political decision-makers — in violation of Article 1.1.

#6. — Cap and Trade: The Clean Energy and Security Act mandates greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, and 84 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. By 2020, this tax will extract an estimated $160 billion from the economy, or an average $1,870 per family. Once again, had the chains of Article 1.8 not been broken, America would be spared such tomfoolery. Cap and trade masked in any disguise whatsoever cannot be justified as a general welfare activity.

#5. — Cash for Clunkers: The government offered $4,500 rebates to people turning in their clunkers for more fuel-efficient vehicles. When the first program quickly ran out of the $4 billion allotted to it, another $2 billion was added. Follow-up analysis showed the program did nothing to stimulate the economy and put many people into additional debt by encouraging them to purchase cars that they otherwise would not have bought during these hard economic times. The government has zero authority to selectively give individuals tax money for purchases of vehicles, according to Articles 1.2 and 1.8 — and common sense.

#4. — TARP Funding: The original 2008 act authorized $700 billion to bail out banks and other institutions. The government has no business rescuing private financial institutions from bad judgment and risky ventures. Article 1.8 excludes permission for Congress to grant financial aid or loans to private companies. Any use of Treasury funds must go toward the general welfare, not to specific groups.

#3. — Illegal Immigration: Arizona is being invaded. When that state passed SB 1070 to stem the flow of violent illegals into its sovereign territory, a derelict federal government turned around and sued. At issue was the Feds’ failure to control the border, so Arizona took it upon itself to do just that — to uphold existing federal immigration laws. It didn’t add new laws; it simply gave local authorities the power to enforce federal responsibilities. The federal government claims the right to manage immigration, but when it refuses to carry out that obligation, thereby jeopardizing the security of border states, it is derelict in its duties. Arizona should haul the federal government before the Supreme Court for malfeasance. Article 4.4 clearly states that the U.S. shall protect states from invasion — more than 400,000 illegal aliens (est.) in Arizona is, by definition, an invasion.

#2. — Economic Stimulus Bill: The $814 billion stimulus is the most backward-thinking proposition to come along since human sacrifice. Dumping borrowed money into an over-fed, bloated and out-of-control ogre doesn’t solve anything, it simply temporarily props up with blocks of melting ice cream a failed and failing government of extravagance. Not only does it illegally take money out of the economy that could be used to provide jobs, but it’s using borrowed money — with interest due.

And the worst violation of the Constitution over the past two years is …

#1. — Health Care Reform: Health care reform was the last lever needed to lift the lid off the pot of American gold and empty it out for socialism. It required all Americans to have health insurance whether they wanted it or not. Earlier this month, Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson said that the government has no power “to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.”

The string of constitutional violations supporting the judge’s rejection is long and shocking:

For purposes of regulation, Congress invoked Article 1.8 and claimed insurance may be controlled because it falls under Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce. But insurance is not interstate commerce — you can’t buy insurance across state lines.

Language in the bill says the health care law may NOT be changed or amended by anyone once signed into law. This violates the role of Congress. Article 1.1 makes it clear that only Congress is authorized to make law, meaning it has every right to alter, amend and change the health care law. To restrict Congress is to change its constitutional duty. The 111th Congress must think it can change the Constitution without amending it — a violation of Article 5, which outlines the amendment process.

The health care bill also violates the 10th Amendment because it coerces states into complying with a new national program that reaches far into state jurisdiction.

So, what do you do when you’re navigating through a blizzard of political white-out where visibility is reduced to zero, the road is slick and slippery, and disaster is strewn about in all directions? You come to a complete stop — and put on the chains.

Paul B. Skousen is a former analyst for the CIA, an intelligence officer in the Reagan White House, and staffer for Senator Orrin Hatch. He has interviewed on Fox News and was featured by Paul Harvey’s The Rest of the Story about smuggling Oliver North’s shredded secrets from the White House. He is a journalist and published author, and the son of W. Cleon Skousen, author of The Five Thousand Year Leap. He is a national Constitution Coach and senior editor with PowerThink Publishing, LLC. Website: www.powerthink.com. Email: paul@powerthink.com.

NEXT: The top 4 violations of the Constitution since Obama took office

DREAM act for illegals

Obama Hot Line set up to report racial profiling in Arizona while Big Dem Gov refuses to protect the border and US citizens against border violations. 6/25/12


Development, Relief, Education for Alien Minors

... who could possibly be against legislation like this

# # # Updated July 16, 2011 # # #

Amnesty for Illegals. DREAM Act criteria for ICE – Immigration and Customs Enforcement – on whether or not illegal immigrants can be deported. They are …

• the person's length of presence in the United States, with particular consideration given to presence while in lawful status;

• the circumstances of the person's arrival in the United States and the manner of his or her entry, particularly if the alien came to the United States as a young child;

• the person's pursuit of education in the United States, with particular consideration given to those who have graduated from a U.S. high school or have successfully pursued or are pursuing a college or advanced degrees at a legitimate institution of higher education in the United States;

• whether the person, or the person's immediate relative, has served in the U.S. military, reserves, or national guard, with particular consideration given to those who served in combat;

• the person's criminal history, including arrests, prior convictions, or outstanding arrest warrants;

• the person's immigration history, including any prior removal, outstanding order of removal, prior denial of status, or evidence of fraud;

• whether the person poses a national security or public safety concern;

• the person's ties and contributions to the community, including family relationships;

• the person's ties to the home country and condition in the country;

• the person's age, with particular consideration given to minors and the elderly;

• whether the person has a U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse, child, or parent;

• whether the person is the primary caretaker of a person with a mental or physical disability, minor, or seriously ill relative;

• whether the person or the person's spouse is pregnant or nursing;

• whether the person or the person's spouse suffers from severe mental or physical illness;

• whether the person's nationality renders removal unlikely;

• whether the person is likely to be granted temporary or permanent status or other relief from removal, including as a relative of a U.S. citizen or permanent resident;

• whether the person is likely to be granted temporary or permanent status or other relief from removal, including as an asylum seeker, or a victim of domestic violence, human trafficking, or other crime; and

• whether the person is currently cooperating or has cooperated with federal, state or local law enforcement authorities, such as ICE, the U.S Attorneys or Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, or National Labor Relations Board, among others.

[thenewamerican.com] 6/27/11 Click Here to read more about the DREAM Act that was defeated in Congress but deemed by Obama.

# # # Updated July 7, 2011 # # #

Kill Obama's Bad DREAM Act NOW – No Amnesty – Secure the Border – Stop Amnesty – Secure America – Defend Arizona … Were you aware that the DREAM Act requires the Department of Homeland Security to award amnesty to every illegal alien claiming to meet minimal criteria:

• Present in US for the last five years;

• A US high school diploma or GED, or admitted to a U.S.institution of higher learning; and

• Of "good moral character" with no more than 2 misdemeanor convictions?
[MinuteManHQ.com] 6/29/11 The Dream Act rewards people who have broken the law and are living in the US illegally. [2?]

Dream Act giving illegal aliens instant citizenship status enacted by Obama despite opposition from the American people and twice voted down by Congress. [Ban Amnesty Now] 6/11/11

# # # Updated May 2011 # # #

White House facts about the DREAM Act. Click Here.

More DREAM Act info. Click Here.

DREAM Act = Amnesty for illegals = more votes for Democrats
BanAmnestyNow.com. Read about Senator Russell Pearce and Arizona Law SB1070 that has stimulated action by DOJ and DC Dems. Click Here.

Dream Act = Amnesty. In the House vote LaRaza was able to find EIGHT [8] Republican turncoats to vote for the "Nightmare [Dream] Act." The American People, once again, were sold out by the very people in the House who claim to represent our interests.

Who is Michelle Obama

Michelle Obama

Her Biography
Born January 17, 1964 in Chicago IL
Princeton, 1985
Harvard Law School, 1988
Married to Barack Obama in 1992
Disbarred in 1993 by Illinois Supreme Court

US flag appears to be disrespected by Michelle Obama at a 911 event. See video. Read her lips. [washingtontimes.com] 9/13/11

WORKING THE SYSTEM

Wow, she must have been really good at her job.

At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post, January 24, 2009, was a column entitled, "Replacing Michelle" in the National Review, The Week.

Here it is as it appeared:

"Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical Center hired her in 2002 to run 'programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting'.

In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 - nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator.

Her husband, Barack Obama, had just become a U.S. Senator. He requested a $1 million "Earmark" for the UC Medical Center. Way to network, Michelle!

Now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?

Let me add that Michelle's position was a part-time, 20-hours-a-week job.

20hrs. X 52 weeks = 1,040 hours per year

$317,000 divided by 1,040 hours = $304.80 per hour.

My thoughts: How did this bit of "quid pro quo" (scratch my back - I'll scratch yours) corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin's garbage and kindergarten files?

I hope this is forwarded so many times that the media will HAVE to cover it..

Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.

Depression is when you lose your job.

Recovery is when Obama loses his job.

Source: Email sent to TheRightJack from a citizen who is paying attention to the details.

Green Energy Failures by Obama

Just in case "they" actually pay attention to facts and figures:

If you happen to find yourself in a discussion with an Obama supporter you might need a few facts to explain why his policies are not all that great.

Green energy failures

Nevada Geothermal Power
Solyndra,
Ener1

Beacon Power
A123
Tesla Motors

Abound Solar
Iberdrola Renewables
Vestas Wind Systems

First Solar
Evergreen Solar
Spectrawatt

Solopower
Bright Source Energy

SunPower, after receiving $1.5 billion from DOE, is reorganizing, cutting jobs.

First Solar, after receiving $1.46 billion from DOE, is reorganizing, cutting jobs.

Solyndra, after receiving $535 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Ener1, after receiving $118.5 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Evergreen Solar, after receiving millions of dollars from the state of Massachusetts, filed for bankruptcy protection.

SpectraWatt, backed by Intel and Goldman Sachs, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Beacon Power, after receiving $43 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Abound Solar, after receiving $400 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Amonix, after receiving $5.9 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Babcock & Brown (an Australian company), after receiving $178 million from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

A123 Systems, after receiving $279 million from DOE, shipped some bad batteries and is barely operating. It cut jobs.

Solar Trust for America, after receiving a $2.1-billion loan guarantee from DOE, filed for bankruptcy protection.

Nevada Geothermal, after receiving $98.5 million from DOE, warns of potential defaults in new SEC filings.

LightSquared ... received a $267 million loan from the United States Department of Agriculture’s Rural Development Utilities Program to provide wireless broadband to 500 communities in 17 states. It was the largest loan in USDA history at the time. Its satellite system would disrupt GPS devices in aircraft among other problems. The FCC ruled that it could not continue development. They filed for bankruptcy and are trying to reorganize.

Brian Hughes at the Examiner wrote:

Obama spent $90 billion of his stimulus package on green energy projects, including weatherization of buildings and development of electric vehicles. Yet, by the end of last year, just 16,100 people landed new jobs in the so-called green industry, Labor Department statistics show, far short of the 200,000 jobs the White House projected it would help create each year.

That comes out to $5.5 million per green job. What a deal!

Fisker ... The luxury carmaker Fisker Automotive continues to signal it could ditch plans to build its next generation hybrid electric vehicle in the United States, despite the nearly $200 million in Obama administration loan money it has already received.

Fisker received federal funds in part to help purchase a shuttered General Motors plant in Delaware, where it predicted it would one day employ 2,000 auto workers to assemble the clean-burning gas-electric family car, known as the Atlantic.

Note: Joe Biden is from Delaware!

Do Nothing Congress?

The political game of compromise

The Democrat campaign theme spread by the media is that Republicans are standing in the way of economic progress that “would” be taking place if it were not for “their” total lack of compromise.

The GOP view is that they are valiantly standing in the way of Democrats implementing more scandalous economic “fixes” that have moved the USA forward with higher taxes, high unemployment, more dependents on Big Gov, more food stamps, bigger government, slow job creation, stagnant business growth based on uncertainty and unknown future regulations, economic disaster and second class word status.

The GOP counters the Democrats by noting that Democrats had control of Congress for four years and did not pass any of the critical legislation they are now accusing the GOP of blocking. Democrats had all of the votes needed but they did not bring up their critical bills because they knew that this would cause them to become big losers at the ballot box.  


A prime example of Democrat failure is the Paycheck Fairness Act. It failed when Democrats controlled Congress and had the 60 votes needed to pass it. This legislation failed then and it failed again recently, except at Democrats now blame the GOP for their own failure. 


The topper to this bit of legislation is that Democrats pay their female staffers 18% less than their males staffers and Ms Pelosi justified this practice. See link here.

Those who complain about the poor performance of Congress want Republicans to agree with Democrats. This is the compromise that Democrats want. There is no interest in Democrats agreeing with Republicans and passing GOP legislation. =TheRightJack on 6/14/12

New high school principal

New high school principal

We watched high school principal Dennis Prager of Colorado , along with Sara Palin and Tom Brokaw on TV a couple of weeks ago....what a dynamic, down to earth speaker. Even though Palin and Brokaw were also guest speakers they did little but nod and agree with him. This is the guy that should be running for President in 2012!

A Speech Every American High School Principal Should Give
By Dennis Prager

To the students and faculty of our high school:

I am your new principal, and honored to be so. There is no greater calling than to teach young people.

I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.

First , this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity. I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships. The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. And the only national identity this school will care about is American. 

This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans. If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity, race and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America , one of its three central values -- e pluribus Unum, "from many, one." And this school will be guided by America 's values. This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness. 

Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interested in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.

Second, I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America's citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English --but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.

Third, because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor, everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school.

Fourth, no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the f-word, you can't speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as "Nigger," even when used by one black student to address another black, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene.

Fifth, we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago -- by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.

Sixth, and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will be devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue... There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately fortunate -- to be alive and to be an American.

Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.

Pass this along if you agree. . . . If not delete…..and later regret it!

Note from TheRightJack on 6/10/12. This was received as an undocumented email. Let us see how long Mr Prager lasts before the PC crowd is able to run him out of town.

Who is Elana Kagan

WHY DOES KAGAN STILL SIT ON THE COURT?

UPDATE: We have warned you since she was appointed SOLICITOR GENERAL that Elena Kagan was UNETHICAL and UNFIT for high office in government! Her record is TAINTED; she CAN BE removed – HELP IMPEACH HER TODAY!

Throughout her confirmation hearings as a nominee for Justice of the Supreme Court, we presented the irrefutable evidence of Kagan's corruption and criminal fraud before that very court, and demanded that the U.S. Senate bring her to book!

Instead, they confirmed her to life tenure on the High Court – which will stand, unless we can compel the Congress to rightfully IMPEACH her.

Is there a legitimate case to be made for Kagan's removal from the Court, or are we – as the leftwing blogs insist – just cranks unjustly attacking a qualified jurist we don't agree with politically? You decide:

During her tenure as Dean at Harvard Law School, Elena Kagan forged the law schools' 'Islamic Finance Project.' Its purpose was "to promote Shariah compliance in the U.S. financial sector." Funding came from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a billionaire investor whose contribution of $10 million to the Twin Towers fund was refused by New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani because bin Talal had publicly blamed the 9/11 Islamic jihad attack on American foreign policy.

Shariah is not some quaint, benign religious-specific code of conduct; nor is it compatible with our Constitution. Islamists seek to spread and enforce Shariah law and fund Muslim "cultural projects" that do not disqualify jihad (holy war) by inducing American and European financial institutions to establish Shariah Compliant Funds in which their clients can invest without conforming to Western norms.

Shariah funds conform in all respects to Shariah law in their investments. They routinely collect 2.5 percent of the principal of any investment annually for donation to Islamic "charitable" institutions, fine recipients of their investment 7 percent for transgressions of Shariah law (and donate the fine to charity), and only invest in projects compliant with the rules of Shariah.

Unfortunately, the decisions as to which investments are compliant and which "charities" receive their benefice are made by Shariah Compliance Boards appointed by the financial institutions that typically include radical Muslim extremists. These imams are the arbiters who routinely designate terrorist-linked entities to receive their "charitable" donations, like the Ground Zero Cordoba mosque (The Holy Land Foundation unindicted co-conspirators list also springs immediately to mind). They also proscribe investment in any firm engaged in U.S. defense contracting on the grounds that the contract could aid Israel – because the Shariah Compliance Boards are overtly anti-Semitic and rabidly hostile to Israel.

Most major banks in the U.S. and Europe have in recent years established Shariah Compliant Funds, and they had almost $1 trillion under management as early as 2007 – with very likely much more today.

Because of her own advocacy for such funds, Harvard Law School now has three Saudi-funded institutions devoted to the "study" of Shariah. Kagan as a Supreme Court justice will be required to rule frequently on possible applications of Shariah law in the United States. She is already on the public record as welcoming "good ideas wherever they originate" and open to applications of foreign law in interpreting U.S. statutes and common law. She is an advocate of record for the Islamization of our nation's financial sector.

A major lawsuit against AIG, seeking to ban Shariah Compliance Funds in banks that accepted TARP money (as violating the First Amendment separation of church and state) is now making its way up to the Supreme Court. Kagan cannot be trusted to rule objectively on this case, nor can we rely on her to properly exclude Shariah law from American jurisprudence.

On June 1, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that a federal taxpayer lacks "standing" to challenge the government's use of taxpayer funds to support Shariah-based activities. The case, which is captioned on appeal as Murray v. United States Department of Treasury, et al., was brought by American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) attorneys David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise, representing the plaintiff, Kevin Murray, a taxpayer and former combat Marine who served in Iraq. The federal lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government's takeover and financial bailout of AIG was in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, because of Shariah compliance.

Elitist judges may think American citizens have no standing to reject Shariah, but our own common sense, and our common law traditions, hold otherwise – as more and more grassroots initiatives are successfully proving. AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi stated, "It is one thing that our government felt compelled to bail out AIG after its fortunes were destroyed due to the company's own recklessness and bad acts. It is quite another thing to use U.S. taxpayer dollars to promote and support AIG's Shariah businesses, all of which don't just sell Shariah products to the Muslim world, but actively promote Shariah as the best, most ethical way of life."

Yerushalmi continued, "Indeed, the Shariah authorities relied upon by AIG's Shariah Supervisory Committees actively promote violent jihad. The fact that the Sixth Circuit acknowledged these facts, but yet found no standing to challenge this impermissible use of taxpayer money under the Constitution is troubling, but this fight is not yet over." The case will appeal to the Supreme Court – upon which Kagan has NO BUSINESS sitting.

Kagan's ties to Shariah Compliance Funds is far from her only taint. There is no debate that the White House is running a relentless public relations campaign of intimidation, lies and media name-calling against Obama reelection opponents and specifically, ObamaCare adversaries, in his thuggish gangster Administration's no-holds-barred offensive to force the bill to be upheld by the Supreme Court – thanks to Elena Kagan's illicit, vital vote.

Will Congress fight back, or be cowed by Alinsky tactics? They seem to be already cowed by the Romney wing of the GOP – Congress lately is very, very quiet about ObamaCare, and Mitt Romney just named an energetic pro-ObamaCare RINO partisan – the aggressive, anti-grassroots elitist, and completely unacceptable Mike Leavitt, as the head of the Romney administration transition team. People are policy, and the Romney policy outlook is very, very bleak for conservatives. If we cannot stand on principle with the GOP to stop ObamaCare, can we pursue justice?

It seems justice is very, very difficult to achieve these days in American courts. Despite lower court actions brought by public watchdog groups Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch seeking to uncover the truth about Kagan's record, America has been completely STONEWALLED on the legal compulsion under which Justice Elena Kagan should have been FORCIBLY RECUSED from ObamaCare hearings!

IT IS THE LAW!

IT IS THE CONSTITUTION!

We have warned you for many months that Obama's latest appointee to the Court, Elena Kagan, was an unethical, committed "progressive" specifically placed there to ensure reliable hard-left votes for him on cases like ObamaCare – no matter what. Yet we could not get the Senate to listen that Kagan is ethically and professionally unqualified, compromised, wholly unfit to be seated as a Supreme Court Justice. Demands from all quarters for her to be unseated, or at the very least to be recused from the ObamaCare decisions, have been stonewalled, because the Court under Obama has been shamefully politicized.

YEARS ago Life and Liberty PAC was SHOUTING about Elena Kagan's subversive senior thesis, "To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933" in which Kagan bemoaned that "a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States" and that" no "radical party" had yet "attained the status of a major political force."

Kagan expressed her solidarity in her thesis with "those who, more than half a century after socialism's decline, still wish to change America." She TOLD us where her radical loyalties lie; her record since is replete with confirmations that she meant it – and we should not doubt her.

We also wrote at length during her confirmation hearings and immediately after, about how as Dean of Harvard Law, Kagan completely removed the core Constitutional Law class requirements from the curriculum, and replaced those essential courses with required studies of international law. 


Notoriously, Kagan also helped Harvard solicit and receive a $20 million "Islamic Studies" grant from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, which implemented not only Shariah Law educational program content into the curriculum, but Shariah-compatible financial practices at Harvard.

Most damning, Elena Kagan is a paid-for criminal hack, demonstrably guilty of falsifying evidence that was brought before the Supreme Court in their deliberations on the constitutionality of state prohibitions upon the so-called "partial-birth abortion" procedure. Kagan then perjured herself on this matter during her SCOTUS confirmation hearings. These felonious actions have been scrupulously documented by American United for Life Action and various other legal watchdog organizations. Life and Liberty PAC brought legal action at the Supreme Court, seeking injunctive relief and Court sanctions against Kagan, to no avail.

Further, Kagan is guilty of conflict of interest and violations of Federal law in presiding on the ObamaCare hearings, as she demonstrably participated in the defense strategy for these cases as Obama's Solicitor General prior to her nomination to the High Court.

Still, because our political "elites" in Washington either fear the Obama machine, or have capitulated to it, no one there will hold Elena Kagan accountable.

It is up to We the People.

We MUST prevail upon the Congress to uphold their oaths of office, and defend the Constitution.

Obama is using the prestige and power of the Oval Office to distract from his destruction of ordered liberty; he is attacking the Supreme Court in incitement to leftist protests and campaigns for impeachment of all five "conservative" Justices if the High Court rules against him!

During a Rose Garden press conference, Obama came out swinging against the Court. He either duplicitously or ignorantly applied the description of judicial activism to the doctrine of judicial review. He then questioned whether an "unelected group of people" (the Supreme Court) could overturn a law approved by Congress (despite federal judicial review of constitutionality having been established in the 1803 landmark caseMarbury v. Madison and representing the main historical task of the Supreme Court)!

Obama went on to declaim that whatever the judiciary determined to be ObamaCare's constitutionality, "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," (denying a principal duty of the federal courts which has been exercised countless times and enforced by Supreme Court decisions striking down more than 163 acts of Congress through 2010.)

Obama, as usual, repeats here another outrageous falsehood – ObamaCare passed under disgraceful procedural irregularities by only 219 to 212, a razor-thin margin, not a strong majority, in which 34 Democrat House members voted nay; however, the margin of passage has never been a factor in the Supreme Court's review of any law's constitutionality.

As every student in America used to be taught, the Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof are the supreme law of the land… Any law contrary to the Constitution is void. The duty of judicial review grants federal courts the power to void acts of Congress that are in conflict with the Constitution.

Obama shamefully chose to conflate modern judicial activism – when judges unconstitutionally legislate from the bench, allow their partisan, personal views about public policy, and not the Constitution, to guide their judicial decisions, and invent new "rights" out of thin air – with the constitutional doctrine of judicial review. For Justices to invalidate a law they deem to be unconstitutional is precisely the duty of the Supreme Court. ("No legislative act … contrary to the Constitution, can be valid," Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #78.)

Obama's inflammatory demagoguery, where facts and history are perverted, lies are pronounced claiming truth, all principle is subordinated to ambition, and reality is simply altered to conform to envisioned fantasy, has been far beyond even what we expected from the Chicago Way.

But it MUST not go unanswered! ObamaCare MUST not stand!

Kagan MUST be held accountable!

We MUST display our superior resolve to the Court, the Congress and the political elites, expressed by YOU, the true American majority of free citizens who overwhelmingly reject the lawlessness and arrogance of Obama and Kagan – and their unbridled trampling of the Constitution!

We the People know this legislation is UNAMERICAN and UNCONSTITUTIONAL – and understand that OBAMA and his partisans like KAGAN have abandoned ALL HONOR AND HONESTY in discussion, debate and deliberation in how we as a people should move forward with healthcare reform!

We have nothing to lose by standing on the Constitution! If ObamaCare is struck down by the Supreme Court, Obama's past defiance of the Court shows he WILL openly resist the decision, inciting the radical Occupy forces to call for protests and impeachments!

So for now – the battle lines are drawn: WE WILL FIGHT FOR FAIRNESS IN THE COURTS! WE WILL FIGHT FOR FAIRNESS IN THE CONGRESS! WE THE PEOPLE WILL FIGHT FOR THE CONSTITUTION!

TELL CONGRESS: WE DEMAND YOU UPHOLD THE LAWFUL REMOVAL OF ELENA KAGAN. IMPEACHMENT NOW!

IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR HER TO RULE ON OBAMACARE, CASES THE DEFENSE FOR WHICH SHE PARTICIPATED IN PREPARING.

WE ALSO CALL FOR CONGRESS TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA'S "UNDERSTANDING" OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND THE DUTIES AND PREROGATIVES OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH AND THE SUPREME COURT!

IT IS PAST TIME FOR CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS TO FULLY INVESTIGATE ELENA KAGAN'S TIES TO SHARIAH COMPLIANCE FUNDS, TO THE ABORTION INDUSTRY, AND HER JUDICIAL "IMPARTIALITY"!

"I have complete confidence in the capability of my colleagues to determine when recusal is warranted," said Chief Justice Roberts in his year-end report, by which he meant each justice individually and personally determining recusal for him or herself.

But with her ethically besmirched record, there are NO grounds for the American people to have "complete confidence" in Elena Kagan rendering justice on ObamaCare, on Shariah-related cases, on pro-life challenges – or frankly anything else!

And after heading the department preparing to defend ObamaCare in court, not to mention managing the attorneys assigned to defend Obama's "signature legislation," it is simply illogical to assume Kagan could be impartial about these cases.

And now, after her performance in the ObamaCare hearings, where we witnessed her still "acting" as Solicitor General and leaping in to make the highly partisan defense arguments that her successor, Donald B. Verrilli Jr., was too flustered or incompetent to present…

Kagan's creepiness will not abate, and new evidence of her radicalism and unethical partiality to Obama socialism will continue to emerge. Documents have been recently uncovered by Breitbart.com that reveal handwritten notes from Elena Kagan to radical professor and Obama mentor, the late Derrick Bell – author of the subversive, discredited "critical race theory" in which Kagan attempts to assist Bell in defending his indefensible racism.

Handwritten correspondence between Bell and Kagan clearly expresses their mutual desire for a "more liberal court" achieved through "skillful lawyering" and the creation of a "common crisis" to bring about the change necessary to accomplish the Left's extremist goals.

The integrity of the Supreme Court, and what remains of our system of co-equal branches and balance of powers, is imperiled by Obama's appointment of the unethical Kagan, and his dangerous demagoguery, his deliberate falsification of history and misrepresentations of our institutions of jurisprudence and fealty to the Constitution – not least of all Kagan's arrogant refusal to recuse herself specifically as law requires from deciding the ObamaCare cases.

KAGAN MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE COURT – SELECT HERE

Will Obama intensify his attack upon the Court, and call out the Occupy mobs upon the Court's conservative Justices, should they defy him, and rule against ObamaCare despite Kagan's vote?

The strength of our Republic lies in the system of checks and balances our Founding Fathers laid out over 200 years ago. They foresaw a time when one branch would overreach its equal and co-governing status and so they provided us with a remedy – the sovereignty of We the People.

We now MUST ACT, and COMPEL our elected representatives in Washington to HONOR THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE – do their job, provide oversight and accountability, and stop the tyranny that seeks to destroy the Constitution.

Congress must demand integrity on the Court in order to preserve the Republic.

Join me now, in demanding Congress take a stand, uphold the law and the Constitution, COMPEL KAGAN'S REMOVAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT UNDER FEDERAL LAW, and fully investigate Obama and Kagan's conduct surrounding the Supreme Court's ObamaCare constitutionality challenges!

Sincerely,

Mary Lewis, Chair
www.LifeAndLibertyPAC.org

For more information about Life and Liberty PAC go to www.LifeAndLibertyPAC.org

To send a check, please mail to:
Life & Liberty Political Action Committee
P.O. Box 131327
Houston, TX 77219-1327

Life & Liberty PAC is a federal political action committee dedicated to advancing the principles of ordered liberty and responsible self-government. We pledge a firm and abiding commitment to support those who stand in defense of our unalienable rights, endowed us by our Creator God and enshrined in our nation's Founding institutions of justice. Thank you for keeping faith and joining with us, for God & Country — Life & Liberty!